Fundamentalism, in a
nutshell, is over-simplifying the world into two camps: mine and everyone else’s.
It is a philosophy born out of stereotyping a particular race, culture or faith
- generalising the most extreme from within that camp and extrapolating to
everyone who identifies with it. It is a mindset that cannot see nuance and
difference between individuals. Everything is black or white; there is no grey.
Unfortunately, life is grey.
No two people think alike. There may be Arab terrorists, but that doesn’t make
all Arabs terrorists. It doesn’t even make most Arabs terrorists.
This Letter to the Rabbi appeared in a UK Jewish Newspaper last week:
Female rabbis acceptable?
Dear Rabbi,
I was always sceptical about ordained Orthodox female rabbis. And
now one has been given a job in an Orthodox synagogue. That should surely
suggest it is becoming acceptable. Do you envisage that happening in the UK?
Gregory
Dear Gregory
In a word, no. Don’t get me started on these
pseudo-suffragettes, or should that read “rabbragettes”? In any event, she got
a job in an “Open-Orthodox” synagogue – whatever that means. Suffice it to say,
a little digging and one discovers on the website that on the High Holidays
they have a “family section” in their synagogue, i.e, no mechitza and men and
women sit together.
So, in summation, when someone gets “ordained”
in some so-called Orthodox manner and immediately takes up her posting in a
synagogue that breaches some of the fundamentals of Orthodoxy (I guess that’s
what they mean by “open”), then you have to call into question the
establishment that “ordains” these women and indeed the women’s own levels of
conviction.
My father always told me: “If the end result is no good, then you know the whole premise is flawed.”
My father always told me: “If the end result is no good, then you know the whole premise is flawed.”
Personally I am not in favour
of the ordination of women, but to state that every woman who is interested in
ordination is agenda-driven and fundamentally flawed is both overly simplistic
and panders to the extreme elements in our community.
I cannot know the personal
motivation of each feminist. Some may have agendas, but I am sure that many are
as sincere in their belief as I claim to be.
How can this Rabbi claim to “know the inner rumblings of the heart”? Is he so all-knowing that
he can dismiss others with whom he disagrees, not on halachic or philosophical
grounds, but rather on projected and assumed intent?
Apparently agendas are only
in the other camps, not our own.
Dear Rabbi- fight fire with fire. If you disagree, disagree on issues. Play the ball, not the person.
Dear Rabbi- fight fire with fire. If you disagree, disagree on issues. Play the ball, not the person.