From the
beginning of time until fairly recently, education was a family affair. The
family unit in general and the parents in particular prodded, nudged and guided
their young by teaching them skills, etiquette and acceptable behaviour.
As civilisation
progressed and the demand for skills broadened beyond the ability of individual
families, education needed to be outsourced and eventually evolved into what we
call schools.
For better
or worse, schools are the surrogate households of today and teachers, our
children’s surrogate parents. If we are to judge an educational institution based
on its success, what are the KPIs (key performance indicators)?
In my
opinion, the education system in the west has evolved into a “12 years
preparation for HSC”. Every year is just one more stepping stone towards that
all-important ATAR, which, in turn, is only valuable in order to get into the
best universities.
However, if
a school produces many distinguished students with enviable grades, but who lack
motivation for life, what is it worth? If the character of our children is not
moulded and their morals not refined, of what value is their education?
Success in
life, however one defines it, cannot be relegated to a number out of 100. Do
teachers view their role as merely transferring information from their heads
into the heads of their students ‒ a virtual USB data transfer?
Education
needs to be reframed. It isn’t about teaching people what to think, but rather
how to think. Education is giving children the life skills needed to know how
to approach difficult problems, how to confront moral dilemmas and how to
create meaningful lives.
No ATAR can
ever do that.
No comments:
Post a Comment